Speaking at TechCrunch Disrupt, Langley argued that reported misconduct stems from individual bad actors rather than systemic failures within the agencies. His comments follow a federal court ruling earlier this month that deemed a warrantless search conducted via Flock cameras unconstitutional. While the company expects that ruling to be overturned on appeal, public scrutiny continues to mount. The Institute for Justice has documented over 240 incidents of law enforcement abusing automated license plate readers since 2021, including officers tracking former partners.
Beyond camera networks, Langley addressed concerns regarding the company’s audio technology, formerly marketed as Raven. Although Flock previously promoted the system’s ability to detect human screams, the company removed that feature following intense pressure from privacy advocates. Langley now asserts the microphones are strictly limited to identifying gunshots, fireworks, and vehicle accidents. Despite these assurances, the company remains a flashpoint for privacy activists, leading to hardware vandalism and legislative pushback, including a proposed federal ban by Senator Bernie Sanders.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!